Custom Model Polish Without Provenance
A checkpoint or LoRA can produce polished work with a consistent style. Look for the original post, prompt history, project file, or creator trail before treating that polish as evidence of origin.

이미지를 드래그 앤 드롭하거나 업로드
JPG · JPEG · PNG · WEBP · 최대 10MB
탐지 후 삭제 · 보고서는 독립적으로 검증 가능
이미지를 업로드하여 시작
왼쪽에 파일을 놓거나 아래 샘플 이미지 중 하나를 선택하세요.
샘플 이미지 사용해 보기
모든 텍스트 뒤에 숨겨진 진실을 밝혀내세요. 무료 AI 감지기를 사용해 콘텐츠가 사람이 작성했는지 AI가 생성했는지 즉시 분석하고 확인하세요.




Upload the portrait, artwork, product visual, or social post you want to check. You do not need to know which Stable Diffusion checkpoint or workflow may have produced it.

Click “Detect Image” to begin. Lynote reviews the uploaded visual and file signals, then estimates how strongly the image leans toward AI-generated or human-made.

Read the AI and human probability signals in the result. If the image affects publication, ownership, payment, or moderation, compare the score with its original source, metadata, creator history, and available workflow files.
Stable Diffusion does not leave one universal visual fingerprint. Check these patterns alongside the detector result and source history, because no single sign proves which model created an image.
A checkpoint or LoRA can produce polished work with a consistent style. Look for the original post, prompt history, project file, or creator trail before treating that polish as evidence of origin.

Inspect hands, jewelry, eyewear, tools, labels, and object intersections. A Stable Diffusion image can look convincing overall while nearby details conflict when viewed together.

Signs, packaging, interface labels, and decorative lettering may resemble real language while containing malformed letters or inconsistent typography. Treat this as a clue, not proof.

Hair, skin, fabric, foliage, windows, and background patterns may repeat, merge, or look unnaturally smooth across different parts of the scene.

Partial edits can leave mismatched edges, texture, scale, shadow, or lighting around a replaced object. Compare the edited area with the rest of the image.

Compare shadows, highlights, mirrors, glass, and reflected objects. A polished composition can still contain local lighting logic that does not hold together.

Examine textures, lighting, repeated objects, malformed text, and backgrounds. This helps guide your review without treating any single artifact as definitive proof.
Camera or software metadata adds useful context to your check. Remember that screenshots, social media platforms, and heavy compression often strip this data away.
Available content credentials, editing history, and embedded watermark evidence support your review process. However, missing provenance does not automatically prove an image is real.
Review Stable Diffusion-style portraits, artwork, and edited visuals in the right context. The page explains relevant clues while the detector supplies a probability signal, without claiming an exact checkpoint or workflow.
Get a clear probability result showing AI and human likelihood. This percentage serves as a practical review signal rather than definitive Stable Diffusion attribution.
Access two review depths tailored to your workflow. Use the basic scan for everyday screening, or apply the advanced depth for higher-stakes editorial decisions.
Upload standard JPG, JPEG, PNG, WebP, and HEIC files. This covers common generation exports, saved web graphics, and standard screenshots.
Your files are processed securely during the scan. We do not store your uploaded images or use them for future model training.

Screen digital portfolio submissions for undisclosed Stable Diffusion generation before approving artwork into community galleries.

Use the AI probability result as one signal when a breaking-news image looks synthetic or arrives without a reliable photographer, source, or capture history.

Flag undisclosed AI assets in marketplace listings to maintain strict platform quality standards for buyers.

Pause suspicious trending images before resharing them, then compare the detector result with the earliest post, credited creator, and available source files.

Check freelance design deliverables to ensure strict compliance with human-only client project briefs and contracts.

Screen suspicious listing visuals before requesting original source files or escalating a platform fraud case.
Still got questions about our stable diffusion image detector? Here are the answers.
A Stable Diffusion detector estimates whether an image may be AI-generated by reviewing visual and available file signals. It returns a probability result for further review, not proof that a particular Stable Diffusion model created the image.
No. While the tool calculates the probability that an image is AI-generated, it cannot determine the specific checkpoint, LoRA, or workflow used. It serves as a visual review signal rather than definitive attribution.
You can upload JPG, JPEG, PNG, WebP, and HEIC images. Select the file and click “Detect Image” to begin the scan.
Malformed text can be one clue, especially on signs, packaging, and interface labels. However, readable text does not prove an image is real, and garbled text does not prove it is AI-generated. Compare this clue with the detector result and source evidence.
Yes. The current image checker accepts supported files up to 10MB.
No. The stable diffusion detector provides a probability signal based on visual patterns, but false positives can occur. It is not absolute proof.
No. We do not store your submitted files or use them to train any AI models. Your privacy is fully protected.
Yes. Basic Scan is available free without payment details. Advanced Scan is a Pro feature for checks that need additional review signals.
No account is required for Basic Scan. Upload an image and run the Stable Diffusion image check online as a guest.
The underlying image detector estimates general AI likelihood; this page frames the result around Stable Diffusion use cases and explains relevant review clues. It still cannot attribute an image to SDXL, a checkpoint, a LoRA, or a particular workflow.
No. A high score suggests the image deserves closer review, but it does not identify the exact generator. Check the original source, project or workflow files, metadata, and creator history before making a consequential decision.
Yes, but heavy resizing, screenshots, and compression can remove useful file or visual signals. Treat the result cautiously and check the highest-quality original when it is available.