Review ChatGPT Images in Schoolwork
Check illustrations, diagrams, and presentation visuals when a student may have created or edited them with ChatGPT Images.

Arrastra y suelta o sube una imagen
JPG · JPEG · PNG · WEBP · máx. 10 MB
Detectado y eliminado · Los informes son verificables de forma independiente
Sube una imagen para empezar
Suelta un archivo a la izquierda o elige una de las imágenes de ejemplo.
Prueba una de nuestras imágenes de ejemplo
Descubra la verdad detrás de cualquier texto. Use nuestro detector de IA gratuito para analizar y verificar al instante si el contenido fue escrito por un humano o generado por IA.




Add the JPG, PNG, WebP, or HEIC file you believe may have come from ChatGPT Images, GPT Image 2, or DALL-E. A file saved directly from its original source usually preserves more useful evidence than a screenshot or social repost.

Select Basic Scan for a quick AI probability result. Use Advanced Scan when you also need available watermark, C2PA, EXIF, dimensions, and file details to review a suspected ChatGPT or GPT Image 2 visual.

Read the image-level AI probability and see which file evidence is present or missing. Compare the report with the claimed source, the original ChatGPT conversation or download when available, and visible clues before deciding whether the image needs further review.
OpenAI-generated images appear in schoolwork, publishing, social feeds, campaigns, and paid creative. These are the moments when a ChatGPT image check can add useful context.
Check illustrations, diagrams, and presentation visuals when a student may have created or edited them with ChatGPT Images.

Examine blog graphics, article illustrations, and submitted visuals before publication when their OpenAI source is unclear.

Review screenshots and downloaded images circulating on social media, even when the original ChatGPT file details are no longer available.

Assess ad concepts and campaign visuals that may have been generated or selectively edited with GPT Image 2.

Check delivered illustrations and design assets when a brief restricts or requires disclosure of ChatGPT image generation.

Look for AI involvement in product images where ChatGPT may have replaced objects, changed backgrounds, or rebuilt selected areas.

Check suspected outputs from the current ChatGPT Images 2.0 experience, GPT Image 2 workflows, and the still-available DALL-E GPT. The detector estimates whether the file looks AI-generated without claiming it can name the exact OpenAI model.
Review visuals created entirely from a ChatGPT prompt as well as uploaded photos that may have been changed with ChatGPT's image editor. The report keeps partial-edit uncertainty visible rather than forcing every file into a confident yes or no.
Start with the original ChatGPT download for the strongest available file context, or check a copied, compressed, and reposted version when that is all you have. The report clearly distinguishes missing evidence from evidence of human origin.
Get an image-level AI probability for the suspected ChatGPT visual, not a fabricated promise of exact GPT Image 2 or DALL-E attribution. This makes the result more useful for decisions that still require human judgment.
Read the AI score beside any available C2PA, watermark, EXIF, and file evidence. Then compare those signals with the claimed ChatGPT source and visible details instead of trusting one isolated clue.
Run a Basic Scan when you need a fast ChatGPT image probability. Move to Advanced Scan when an OpenAI image claim calls for a closer look at provenance and file-level context.
Upload common formats used for ChatGPT downloads, copied web images, and mobile shares, including JPG, PNG, WebP, and HEIC.
Review the suspected ChatGPT image's AI probability, available provenance checks, and file information together before deciding whether to publish, approve, or investigate it further.

Check assignment illustrations, posters, and presentation graphics when students are required to disclose images created with ChatGPT or DALL-E.

Review submitted article art and featured images when a contributor may have used ChatGPT Images but did not provide a clear source.

Check viral visuals, branded graphics, and copied ChatGPT images before they are reposted from a company account.

Review campaign concepts and commissioned artwork when a brief limits or requires disclosure of GPT Image 2 and ChatGPT-generated assets.

Inspect visual evidence when an undisclosed ChatGPT-generated or edited image could affect an approval, reimbursement, or policy decision.

Check delivered illustrations when the contract distinguishes original human work from images generated or edited through ChatGPT.
Still got questions about our ChatGPT AI image detector? Here are the answers.
A ChatGPT image detector checks whether a visual may have been created or edited with ChatGPT Images, GPT Image 2, DALL-E, or another OpenAI image workflow. Lynote returns an image-level AI probability and surfaces available file evidence for human review.
Yes. GPT Image 2 is OpenAI's current state-of-the-art image generation and editing model. This GPT Image 2 detector can assess a suspected output and return an AI-likelihood estimate, but it cannot prove that GPT Image 2 was the exact source.
No. While it provides an AI probability score and surfaces available file evidence, it cannot attribute an image to one exact model with absolute certainty.
Missing metadata does not prove an image is human-made, as social media platforms often strip this data. The tool relies on probabilistic visual analysis when metadata is absent.
No, the results are probabilistic signals rather than definitive proof. False positives can occur, so the tool should be used to support human review rather than make final judgments.
Yes. ChatGPT images can be copied, saved, and shared, so the file you receive may be a screenshot or compressed repost. You can still check it, but the original download usually preserves more file evidence and gives the detector better context.
The general AI Image Detector covers pictures from many generator families. This page is built around a narrower question: whether a visual suspected of coming from ChatGPT Images, GPT Image 2, or DALL-E appears AI-generated. It still does not claim exact model attribution.
Yes. ChatGPT can add, remove, or update selected areas of an uploaded image, and it can also apply broader edits from a written instruction. You can check the result, but a small localized edit may be harder to detect than an entirely generated image.
No, you can use the basic scan feature to check images without signing up or creating an account.
The basic scan provides a quick, image-level AI probability score. The advanced scan digs deeper, surfacing available watermarks, C2PA data, EXIF details, and file dimensions for a thorough review.
The report shows an overall AI probability score. If available, it also displays provenance metadata, including C2PA credentials, embedded watermarks, file type, and EXIF data.
ChatGPT can comment on visible details, but that answer does not establish where a file came from. A dedicated ChatGPT image checker gives you a repeatable image-level probability and available file evidence to use alongside the original source and human judgment.